Psychiatrists and other mental health professionals study various aspects of human motivation. Most believe people aren’t inherently stupid. There’s a lot of data to also support the notion that many people will gravitate to a position of less resistance.
It’s known as “taking the easy way out”. Not everyone has the same level of personal motivation or pride in their achievements. Many just aspire to make it through life using a pathway that employs the least common denominator.
Again, they are fine with following the easiest road with the fewest headaches and exerting the least amount of effort. However, there are bills to be paid and mouths to feed. So, most people need to work to keep food in their bellies and a roof over their heads.
Well, in certain liberal-run U.S. cities, bureaucrats are inclined to reward those who seek the least. One of the most radically liberal cities in the United States is San Francisco. The city’s horrific homeless crisis is well documented.
But why is homelessness so much worse in cities such as San Francisco? It can’t be all about sunny skies and more temperate California temperatures. There must be something more.
The homelessness issue cannot be specific to “nice weather”. It’s not that way everywhere.
According to one new San Francisco homeless man, it’s because they encourage people to take the road with least resistance. San Francisco’s policies offer people “the easy way out”. Turns out, San Francisco rewards a lack of motivation and a low sense of personal responsibility.
If you’re homeless and don’t feel compelled to “pick yourself up by your bootstraps”, San Francisco will pay you to stay homeless and destitute. It’s not all glamour and glory, for certain, but being homeless in San Francisco can be a rather lucrative occupation.
Michael Shellenberger is the author of a book titled “San Fransicko: Why Progressives Ruin Cities”. Shellenberger recently sat down to talk with one of San Francisco’s hundreds of homeless people. What Shellenberger discovered is astonishing.
Even though “James” broke down with emotion, he still provided an enlightening insight into why so many people in San Francisco choose to be homeless. It’s a choice, not always out of necessity. In talking to Shellenberger, James admitted this.
He also said being homeless, especially in San Francisco, is “literally so f***ing easy.” It’s so easy, James moved from Texas to San Francisco to pursue a “career as a homeless man”. James explained the guidelines for earning a comfortable living as a homeless person in San Francisco.
Shellenberger asked him how he obtained the necessary funds to live. The explanation was simple, but equally baffling. The self-proclaimed man who is “homeless by choice”, said, “F***ing phone call, bro. $200 in food stamps and $620 cash a month. Forget about it. This right now is literally by choice, literally by choice.”
James continued his explanation by exposing the reality of San Francisco’s homeless policies. It’s simple, James said, “If we’re going to be realistic, they pay you to be homeless here.” San Francisco budgets $300 million annually to subsidize its homeless population.
Last year, local officials were concerned over a particular expenditure. Evidently, the city spent roughly $16.1 million on giving tents and food to a few hundred people in a pop-up homeless village.
This taxpayer-funded homeless encampment offered city-funded security and extensive COVID-19 relief measures. As Shellenberger continued to speak to James, the self-described homeless professional opened up even more.
James boasted, “Why wouldn’t I do it? You know, it’s f***ing free money, dude,” James explained. Why would I want to pay rent? I’m not doing s***. I’ve got a f***ing cell phone that I have Amazon Prime and Netflix on.”
James also exposed a darker side to his daily lifestyle. He shared how he lives his life “literally 10 feet away from drug dealers.” He chuckled at the idea of why these people don’t get arrested. Furthermore, James laughed off the notion.
He explained that, “San Francisco is a sanctuary city. We arrest the Hondurans, and we put them in jail, they’re out two days later.” Like many of San Francisco’s homeless, James supplements his government handout with part-time work. James is a homeless, government-funded drug dealer.
He confessed to selling Fentanyl to a 15-year-old. San Francisco officials try to blame the city’s horrific homeless crisis on a lack of housing. However, all you have to do is look at the numbers. The homeless crisis in San Francisco is so horrible, not because of a lack of places to live, but because there are thousands of homeless people.
They’re not in “Frisco” to find a place to live. They’re in San Francisco because they will be paid “not to find a place to live”. San Francisco offers full-time employment, evidently with some side benefits, to those who are homeless. Most people aren’t comfortable living on the streets.
However, there are thousands who do not experience a normal sense of personal pride and self-motivation. To them, living on the streets is fine. It’s even finer when city officials cut them a paycheck every week, plus feed them for free. Dozens of liberal-run cities like San Francisco don’t have a housing crisis because of a lack of housing.
It’s because of ignorant liberal policies. When you pay some people to be homeless, they will. Especially, the law allows them to work a lucrative “side-hustle” peddling illegal narcotics. Why not take the job? As the old saying goes, “it’s tough work, but somebody’s got to do it.”
The post ‘Why Wouldn’t I Do It?’: Homeless Man Breaks Down Why He Moved From Texas To San Francisco appeared first on Steadfast Clash.
Source by [author_name]
