Hundreds of law-abiding U.S. citizens remain in jail awaiting trial. All many of these Americans did was voice their anger over a corrupted presidential election. These patriotic conservatives disputed the results of the 2020 presidential election.
Many got swept up in a suspiciously chaotic protest. They believed, as millions still do, that Joe Biden cheated to win. He did. President Trump helped orchestrate a legal protest against the stolen election. He has continually held his ground in disputing the results.
The questions of fraud are there. President Trump believes the evidence exposing outright fraud is overwhelming. It is. Personal testimony, along with surveillance camera video, proves that cheating during the 2020 presidential election was rampant.
However, if any conservative American questions the validity of Joe Biden’s suspicious vote count, they’re denounced as crazy conspiracy theorists. They’re a domestic terrorist. But what if we were to look back at the election prior to Joe Biden’s stealing of the presidency?
Donald J. Trump, a proud, patriotic conservative Republican, won the 2016 election. He became the 45th President of the United States. There was no ongoing pandemic, a bogus excuse to open the door for widespread mail-in voting fraud.
Voting precincts weren’t stuffed with Republican operatives. Suspicious computerized voting machines weren’t suddenly swept away after the election. Suitcases of ballots weren’t caught on camera, being mysteriously hauled out from under tables in the middle of the night.
Hundreds of hours of surveillance video didn’t expose “ballot harvesting mules”, dropping thousands of illegal ballots into drop boxes. President Trump ran on a platform to “Make America Great Again.” He spoke a message that resonated with the American people.
He won the election legitimately; despite liberals’ falsely trying to say Russia intervened to swing the outcome. They did not. No one did anything to corrupt the 2016 election results. However, did loser Hillary Clinton and her Democratic Party admit that they were legitimately defeated?
No, they did not. In fact, crooked Hillary and the rest of her corrupt radicals still have not conceded that Americans did not want her to be president. They spoke as much against her as a person, as they did in support of the platform of President Trump.
The majority of Americans despise Hillary Clinton, and they said so. Nonetheless, the self-entitled, spoiled brat that Hillary is regularly blasts President Donald Trump as an “illegitimate president.” She kept calling him illegitimate throughout his successful presidency.
In the fall of 2019, Hillary referred to President Trump as “illegitimate” and a “corrupt human tornado.” This is obviously a resentful loser who still disputes the results of an election. But what about all the conservatives who are still disputing the suspicious results from 2020?
Do liberals feel they are within their constitutional right to question the legitimacy of Joe Biden? Despite troves of evidence indicating more fraud than anyone wants to admit, are conservatives allowed to press for audits, overseeing their constitutional right to securely elect their leaders?
No, they are not. In fact, if you were unfortunate enough to be part of a constitutionally supported “stop the steal” protest on January 6, 2020, you might still be in jail. You’ve been imprisoned since that day, because you disputed the results of an election.
Just for mistakenly walking through an open door, possibly committing misdemeanor trespass, you’re being labeled an insurrectionist. Hillary Clinton and the rest of the radical progressive wing of the Democrat Party can still dispute the results of a six-year-old election.
But if you’re a President Trump supporter and question the results of the obviously tainted 2020 election, you’re an unpatriotic terrorist. There are different sets of rules for conservatives and liberals. Liberals can do what they want and say what they want with impunity.
There is a dangerous double standard at play in the United States. It will tear our democracy apart at its core. Having two sets of rules for political discourse leaves one party silenced. This will ultimately lead to authoritarian, one-party rule. But that’s what Democrats want. It’s obvious.
Source by [author_name]