Vice President Kamala Harris knows Joe is a buffoon and she is moving in to take over.
During a segment on CBS “Face the Nation” Kamala subtly condemned Biden’s COVID rhetoric and is taking a more middle-of-the-road approach.
When asked if the pandemic was the fault of the unvaccinated Harris responded differently than Biden. Host, Margaret Brennen asked her if the pandemic was “the fault of the unvaccinated?”
“I don’t think this is a moment to talk about fault. It- it is no one’s fault that this virus hit our shores or hit the world. I would not blame it on anyone in that way. But it is more about individual power and responsibility, and it’s about the decisions that everyone has the choice to make, no doubt. But it is clear that everyone has the ability to make a choice to save their lives and- and to prevent hospitalization if they get vaccinated and if they get the booster. And so I urge people to do that,” she said.
WATCH: VP Harris tells @margbrennan that the current surge of COVID cases “is more about individual power and responsibility” then setting blame on the unvaccinated. pic.twitter.com/NJzhBfJL80
— Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) December 26, 2021
It may be subtle but that is the opposite tone Biden has taken.
Harris also told Brennen that she is planning on becoming more involved in policy.
For @VP Harris, a seat on the Supreme Court just isn’t on her mind — right now. She tells @margbrennan that a more active role in policy making is what she is focused on.
Tune in to Face the Nation for more of our exclusive interview TODAY at 10:30am E.T. pic.twitter.com/qAWantJSRN
— Face The Nation (@FaceTheNation) December 26, 2021
Kamala did stump for the Build, Back, Better Bill claiming that it will strengthen the economy.
“We know that Build Back Better will strengthen the economy. And so, I think there is without any question, room for discussion about what actually will be the impact to the economy. And objective, leading and highly respected economists are weighing in on this discussion to say, in fact, no. And you can look at the impact on- on- on the economy and see that not only is it morally right to say parents shouldn’t have to struggle to take care of their basic needs like caring for their children and their parents- and their parents and their elder relatives. But it actually makes economic sense to do that and it brings down the cost of living,” she said.
The bill is dead and so are their legislative abilities for the next year.
